Grid trading specialist, cross-exchange arbitrage.
Bitsgap has decent onboarding but isn’t as guided as Cryptohopper. Grid trading requires understanding range vs. trend markets, and a beginner can lose quickly if they launch a grid on a crashing crypto. The 7-day free trial lets you test without commitment-use it to validate on paper before real capital.
This is Bitsgap’s sweet spot. If you already grasp grid trading and want to take it further (multi-exchange, automatic arbitrage, 365-day backtesting), it’s the best platform. The Basic tier at $29/month is enough for 2 active bots, while Advanced at $69 unlocks unlimited bots.
For a pro specializing in grid + cross-exchange arbitrage, Bitsgap is top of the market. The Pro tier at $149/month includes premium API and market making. The only thing missing is custom code scripting (Python or Pine) for maximum flexibility.
Bitsgap is based in Estonia (EU) with partial MiCA confirmation. Not on the AMF blacklist, but has a standard 'unclear' status. More reassuring than 3Commas, which had its 2022 incident. If you want maximum compliance, wait for full CASP registration or check Cryptohopper (Netherlands).
Bitsgap is the specialist in grid trading and cross-exchange arbitrage. Founded in 2018 in Estonia, it occupies a clear niche: if you want grid trading across 13 exchanges simultaneously with automatic arbitrage between them, this is your platform. The major differentiator is its advanced simulator (backtesting on 365 days of historical data with scenarios) and exchange coverage (Binance, Kraken, KuCoin, OKX, Bybit, Bitfinex, Huobi, and 6 others). It’s less polished in UX than Cryptohopper and less flexible in multi-strategy than 3Commas, but when it comes to grid + arbitrage specifically, Bitsgap is unbeatable.
Email signup + optional 2FA (recommended). A 7-day free trial gives you full access to the Pro tier to test without commitment.
13 supported exchanges. Guided integration wizard per exchange. Trade-only API permissions required, IP whitelisting recommended.
You choose a pair (e.g., ETH/USDT), set the bounds (e.g., 3000-4000), the number of grids (e.g., 100), and the allocated capital. Bitsgap simulates the expected return in pre-flight.
Before launching, the simulator runs your config on real historical data and shows you total profit, drawdown, and number of trades. It’s the best backtest on the consumer market.
The bot runs 24/7. Optionally, cross-exchange arbitrage automatically detects price differences between Binance and Kraken (for example) and executes if the margin covers fees. Full mobile app available.
STORIES · DEMOS
DecrypteBot scores each bot on 8 weighted criteria : security (20 %), compliance (16 %), exchanges (12 %), strategies (12 %), backtest (12 %), pricing (10 %), UX (10 %), support (8 %).
80/100: 2FA recommended, IP whitelisting, annual external audits, EU hosting (GDPR-compliant). No major incidents reported since its 2018 founding. -20 points for lack of proof-of-reserves and public bug bounty.
92/100: 13 integrated exchanges (Binance, Kraken, KuCoin, OKX, Bybit, Bitfinex, Huobi, HitBTC, Bitpanda Pro, Gemini, Poloniex, Bittrex, EXMO). Top of the market. Aligned with 3Commas.
80/100: Grid (specialist), DCA, Combo, Signal, Arbitrage. Less varied than 3Commas (no Options, no dedicated Futures) but unbeatable grid depth.
85/100: Best backtest on the consumer market. 30, 90, 180, 365 days of real historical data, with profit/drawdown/Sharpe ratio. Missing Monte Carlo for 95+.
72/100: 7-day free trial, Basic $29/month, Advanced $69/month, Pro $149/month. Expensive if you activate multiple strategies. Penalized compared to Pionex (free) and Coinrule (freemium).
85/100: Dense but well-structured interface. Decent onboarding, though not premium. Aggregated portfolio dashboard, functional mobile app. -7 points vs. Cryptohopper.
78/100: Live chat, knowledge base, Telegram community. Technical responses in 4-8 hours during business hours. Partial multilingual support (EN, RU).
68/100: Estonia, partial MiCA confirmation. No French PSAN, no UK FCA. 'Unclear' AMF status but not blacklisted. Top tier in its consumer segment.
This is Bitsgap’s flagship use case. You launch 5 grids across 5 different exchanges from a single interface, with 365-day backtesting to calibrate. No competitor does it better.
Bitsgap detects price differences between connected exchanges and executes arbitrage if the margin covers fees. This is unique in the consumer SaaS bot trading category.
Bitsgap’s simulator is the deepest on the market. 365 days of real historical data, with profit/drawdown/Sharpe ratio displayed. Ideal for validating a strategy before using real capital.
Bitsgap doesn’t have a signal marketplace like Cryptohopper or 3Commas. If you want to automatically follow Telegram signals, check 3Commas (Signal Bot) or Cryptohopper (marketplace).
Bitsgap doesn’t support native Python or Pine Script. For this need, check Trality or HaasOnline. Incoming webhooks are possible as a workaround, but not natively.
MiCA enters EU force
Source officielleDecrypteBot audit
| Price | mo | yr |
|---|---|---|
| Basic | $29 | $252 |
| Advanced | $69 | $588 |
| Pro | $149 | $1260 |
Binance, Kraken, KuCoin, OKX, Bybit, Bitfinex, Huobi, HitBTC, Bitpanda Pro, Gemini, Poloniex, Bittrex, EXMO
Bitsgap’s advantage is its specialization in grid + arbitrage with 13 connected exchanges and a 365-day backtest simulator. No competitor does this vertical as well: Cryptohopper has grid but less backtest depth, 3Commas has lighter grid, Pionex does grid but only on its own liquidity. The downside is that if you want broad multi-strategy (Options, Futures, Copy trading), 3Commas remains more comprehensive. Bitsgap is the specialist, not the Swiss Army knife.
Crypto trading carries a high risk of capital loss. DecrypteBot does not provide investment advice.
Pionex is free and offers 16 built-in bots, including advanced grid (Infinity Grid, Leveraged Grid). If you’re okay with the AMF blacklist status, it’s unbeatable in pricing.
Read review →3Commas has a broader catalog (SmartTrade, Options bots, advanced multi-account) if you want to go beyond grid + arbitrage. The Pro tier at $37 is more affordable than Bitsgap’s Advanced at $69.
Read review →Cryptohopper has a more accessible UX and unlimited free paper trading. If you’re a beginner or want a template marketplace, it’s smoother.
Read review →Basic: $29/mo | Advanced: $69/mo | Pro: $149/mo
AMF: Unclear | MiCA: Partial | FCA: Unclear | SEC: Unclear | CVM: Unclear
Grid, DCA, Combo, Signal, Arbitrage
Binance, Kraken, KuCoin, OKX, Bybit, Bitfinex, Huobi, HitBTC, Bitpanda Pro, Gemini...
There is no profitability guarantee. On grid trading with range-bound pairs, first profits typically appear in 2-4 weeks if the market stays in range. On long-term DCA, expect 6-24 months minimum. Outcome depends on market, capital and strategy. Test in demo or paper trading before committing cash.
Binance, Kraken, KuCoin, OKX, Bybit, Bitfinex, Huobi, HitBTC, Bitpanda Pro, Gemini, Poloniex, Bittrex, EXMO
Three major risks : (1) market - a crashing crypto loses capital even with a well-tuned bot, (2) platform - bankruptcy, hack or regulatory pull of the exchange/bot can lock your funds, (3) configuration - a poorly restricted API key or miscalibrated grid can amplify losses. Always test in paper trading and limit exposed capital.
If the bot platform shuts down, your bots stop but your funds remain on the connected exchange (they never went through the bot). If the exchange itself shuts down, it's more serious : withdrawals, KYC, sometimes weeks of delay. That's why we favor PSAN/MiCA-registered exchanges for long-term funds.
In a bear market, classic grid trading amplifies losses (you accumulate during the fall). Prefer extended DCA (averaged buys over 12-24 months) or short futures with tight stops for advanced traders. Otherwise, better stay out and wait for the next cycle.
Trustpilot reviews not available at audit date.
The global score is a weighted average of 8 criteria : security (20 %), compliance (16 %), exchanges (12 %), strategies (12 %), backtest (12 %), pricing (10 %), UX (10 %), support (8 %). Each sub-score is justified in writing in the methodology section of each review. Verifiable sources, public methodology.
Start with the full 2026 ranking or dive straight into the methodology.